<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Firebones &#187; contest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.firebones.com/category/contest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.firebones.com</link>
	<description>Code.  Money.  Literature.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 03:59:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>StockTwits for Idiot Retail Investors: Week #1</title>
		<link>http://blog.firebones.com/2009/01/11/stocktwits-for-idiot-retail-investors-week-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.firebones.com/2009/01/11/stocktwits-for-idiot-retail-investors-week-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocktwits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.firebones.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[StockTwits for Idiot Retail Investors: Week #1
Okay, one week into my StockTwits experiment and two trades closed out.
Closed out about half of $NDAQ exposure
First, despite @alphatrends&#8216; chastisement expression of concern (see my mea culpa for why chastisement was mischaracterization) in last week&#8217;s comment thread about not paying close enough attention to his reportage, I managed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>StockTwits for Idiot Retail Investors: Week #1</p>
<p>Okay, one week into my <a href="http://stocktwits.com/">StockTwits experiment</a> and two trades closed out.</p>
<h3>Closed out about half of $NDAQ exposure</h3>
<p>First, despite <a href="http://twitter.com/alphatrends/">@alphatrends</a>&#8216; <del datetime="00">chastisement</del> expression of concern (see my <a href="http://blog.firebones.com/2009/01/12/pretty-cool-retweet-and-a-mea-culpa/">mea culpa for why chastisement was mischaracterization</a>) in <a href="http://blog.firebones.com/2009/01/05/stocktwits-for-idiot-retail-investors-week-0/">last week&#8217;s comment thread</a> about not paying close enough attention to his reportage, I managed to turn that failed trade into a good trade by selling all my $NDAQ put options on Thursday&#8217;s drop for a ~24% gain.  In at cost basis of $2.47, out at 3.10.</p>
<p>The funny story here: I got props from <a href="http://twitter.com/howardlindzon/">@howardlindzon</a> for the trade, but he said it was too early, teenager:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.firebones.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/picture-1.png"><img src="http://blog.firebones.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/picture-1.png" alt="" width="489" height="59" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-183" /></a></p>
<p>Only I spent half the day incorrectly thinking he was calling <em>me</em> a teenager.  I prefer grasshopper.  Or idiot retail investor.  I was chagrined.  Damn, I missed the insult @howardlindzon day earlier, when I wanted to give him crap about his inability to use apostrophes appropriately in his tweets, and here he was, bagging on me bailing out too soon.  Schvitz-behavior-critiquing mofo.</p>
<p>Then I realized about lunchtime that he was talking about $NDAQ as being a teenager (meaning: eventually trading in the teens).</p>
<p>God, I&#8217;m a dork.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m still sitting on my $NDAQ short with a cost basis of 23.50.  I tried closing it out Friday at a $21 bid, but it didn&#8217;t hit.  I&#8217;ll let this one ride, teenagers.</p>
<h3>Sold Some $SRS Premium</h3>
<p>Okay, this one worked out&mdash;sorta.  I sold calls on half my $SRS position.  The half (lol) with the $60 cost basis.  $70 calls at $1.95 premium.  My overall cost basis is $86, so if this gets called, I&#8217;m okay (although my cost basis will rise on the overall position to $101 counting these profits.)  Not a huge position, so not a lot of premium, and not a lot to write home about.</p>
<p>The one thing I heard this week that intrigued me (on NPR&#8217;s Marketplace): commercial property owners are proactively giving retail tenants lease discounts in order to keep them as viable lessors.  One example was a top-down mandate to a commercial real estate concern to slash in-progress negotiated leases by 20% to try to keep the retailers from folding.  I&#8217;m not smart enough to know the best way to play this.  It seems like there&#8217;s some long-term arbitrage opportunity here.  It feels like this is a case of &#8220;we all go down together&#8221; and the play is to short $RTH and go long $SRS, but I haven&#8217;t thought through the game theoretical issues here.  Intuition says that it is $SRS that gets hosed no matter what.  They lose either way.  They give concessions, and margins go down; they don&#8217;t, and retailers bail and close stores and they hurt.  So despite being way underwater on my $SRS position, I&#8217;m liking my 5-6 month chances on turning this one around.  The commercial real estate industry is panicking, and they&#8217;re counting on retailers of all people to save them.  Show me some consumer sentiment and I&#8217;ll cover.</p>
<h3>In other news: $COST, $AAPL</h3>
<p>I <em>just about</em> covered my $COST (Costco) puts this week.  They&#8217;re good to the tune of about 22% on paper, after <a href="http://stocktwits.com/t/WMT">Wal-Mart&#8217;s</a> fade on Thursday.  I&#8217;m letting these run a little bit more.  While I haven&#8217;t disclosed position size yet on any of these trades (waiting for some of last year&#8217;s trades to close out before setting that up), if $COST drops to around $48 this upcoming week, I will bank a 45% gain on the puts and the profit will be roughly equal to my $NDAQ put sale this week.  This is about 11% of my trading account (and the trading account is in turn is about 16% of my overall brokerage position), so you get the sense of how I view a lot of these trades as tuition in my learning process.  In the big picture, I&#8217;m trying to stay too small to fail.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still negative on $AAPL with the puts (April 80s at 16.86 cost basis) despite my household buying four $AAPL products over the holidays to the tune of about four grand.  Win or lose, I&#8217;m going to need to close out this position soon due to the time factor.  Right now, I&#8217;m down about 6%.  While in the long-long term I&#8217;m bullish on $AAPL, in the short term I believe it is range bound between $80 and $100, with all the trends pointing to it hitting $65-$70 before it hits $110 (based on lack of transparency around Jobs&#8217; health status).  If you&#8217;re buying stock for your kids&#8217; college fund, go long.  If you&#8217;ve got a 12-month time frame, short it north of $90.  They have quality management, they have an incredible coherent strategy and management team (second only to $AMZN), but they have the problem in 2009 of a down economy (which will cause them to hold back major innovations) and the doubt around Jobs health.  At some point this year, all the bad news will be out (it&#8217;s not yet) and AAPL stock will fall and then you can safely load up.  Just not at $90.  (I expressed similar sentiment in the <a href="http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/01/selling-apple-a.html">comments over on Fred Wilson&#8217;s blog</a>, with additional info on $GOOG.  Great post and comments all around.)</p>
<p>On this trade, the time factor is getting me, so I will look to cover soon and will take whatever profits I can find should it drop to the $85-$86 this week.  Hoping for lots of volatility prior to expiration.</p>
<h3>What I&#8217;m Watching This Week</h3>
<p>If you want my play of the upcoming week, it&#8217;s going to be this: let&#8217;s assume that $PALM ascends another 10-20% Monday/Tuesday based on the announcement of its new Pre platform.  And let&#8217;s say that $AAPL falls 5% because folks think it&#8217;s a zero-sum game and the iPhone is hurt because of this.  Then then trade is to cover your $AAPL short on the dip and immediately flip into a $PALM short (or put) situation.  I know jack about technical analysis, so I can&#8217;t tell you about support, but I sure like $AAPL&#8217;s management over $PALM&#8217;s, and it should be pretty straightforward to know who the platform winners are going to be.  $AAPL and $RIMM we still talk about in a few years; $PALM is just delaying the inevitable.  There&#8217;s maybe only a 1 in 5 chance this will happen or that I&#8217;ll actually go through with the trade, but it&#8217;s one thing I&#8217;m watching.  I like to trade overreactions and irrational exuberance, and any love of $PALM to me oozes irrationality.</p>
<h3>What I Owe</h3>
<p>I really need to give you the blow-by-blow of my September through December experiences in the market (including my schooling in $SPY and $USO calls), as well as the long-term history of my trading experience and use of online intelligence sources.  I&#8217;ll sneak those in as posts over the next couple of weeks.  It&#8217;s important background if you&#8217;re trying to judge whether I&#8217;m a voice worthy of catching in your filter.  And since my day job makes being a day trader (with the requisite attention span needed) impossible, I&#8217;ll detail how I trade with a limited attention span and time.</p>
<h3>Who I&#8217;m Tuning Into</h3>
<p>This week I&#8217;ve begun to follow <a href="http://twitter.com/alphatrends/">@alphatrends</a> blog more carefully, as well as <a href="http://twitter.com/fortune8/">@fortune8</a> (appreciate the rationality of another part-timer) and <a href="http://twitter.com/BuyOnTheDip/">@BuyOnTheDip</a> (because I&#8217;m bearish as well).  Haven&#8217;t decided yet on <a href="http://twitter.com/mandlebrot/">@mandelbrot</a> though&mdash;love the art but not sure I can read the correlations between free text tweets and stock prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.firebones.com/2009/01/11/stocktwits-for-idiot-retail-investors-week-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Post-Convention Stock Contest Roundup</title>
		<link>http://blog.firebones.com/2008/09/07/post-convention-stock-contest-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.firebones.com/2008/09/07/post-convention-stock-contest-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BWLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks contest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.firebones.com/2008/09/07/post-convention-stock-contest-roundup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overall portfolio of all family contestants is off 19%.  I manage to still be in the lead with a 2.1% overall gain, buoyed by Buffalo Wild Wings and Mueller Water Products.  But wow.  Caveat: there may be some splits I haven&#8217;t accounted for in the overall results, but from what I can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall portfolio of all family contestants is off 19%.  I manage to still be in the lead with a 2.1% overall gain, buoyed by Buffalo Wild Wings and Mueller Water Products.  But wow.  Caveat: there may be some splits I haven&#8217;t accounted for in the overall results, but from what I can tell at first glance, these were stocks that just halved their prices without a split.</p>
<p>My results:</p>
<ul>
<table style="font-family: Monaco "Courier New" Courier monospace;">
<tr>
<td>	Berkshire Hatha Class B Ord Shs 		</td>
<td style="text-align: right">	-17.40%	</td>
<tr>
<td>	Mindray Medical International Ltd 		</td>
<td style="text-align: right">	-12.12%	</td>
<tr>
<td>	PowerShares Water Resource Portfolio 		</td>
<td style="text-align: right">	-4.81%	</td>
<tr>
<td>	Buffalo Wild Wings Inc 		</td>
<td style="text-align: right">	63.57%	</td>
<tr>
<td>	Mueller Water Products Series A Ord Shs 		</td>
<td style="text-align: right">	11.97%	</td>
<tr>
<td>	Central European Distribution Corp 		</td>
<td style="text-align: right">	-8.87%	</td>
<tr>
<td>	Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp 		</td>
<td style="text-align: right">	-18.24%	</td>
<tr>
<td>	Grant Prideco Inc 		</td>
<td style="text-align: right">	3.39%	</td>
</table>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.firebones.com/2008/09/07/post-convention-stock-contest-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>-1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Stock Contest Results: End of Q1 Edition</title>
		<link>http://blog.firebones.com/2008/03/31/family-stock-contest-results-end-of-q1-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.firebones.com/2008/03/31/family-stock-contest-results-end-of-q1-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock contest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.firebones.com/2008/03/31/family-stock-contest-results-end-of-q1-edition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The brutal first quarter, worst in the stock market in five years, comes to a close and I retain my lead in the family stock picking contest, only down 10.38%.  The combined portfolio of all participants is now down 15.8% for the year.  The only saving grace is that I&#8217;m beating the NASDAQ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The brutal first quarter, worst in the stock market in five years, comes to a close and I retain my lead in the family stock picking contest, only down 10.38%.  The combined portfolio of all participants is now down 15.8% for the year.  The only saving grace is that I&#8217;m beating the NASDAQ as well as all the European and Asian <a href="http://www.raymondjames.com/indices1.htm">indices</a>.</p>
<ul>
<table style="font-family: Monaco "Courier New" Courier monospace;">
<tr>
<td>Berkshire Hatha Class B Ord Shs</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-5.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mindray Medical International Ltd</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-32.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PowerShares Water Resource Portfolio</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-10.09%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Buffalo Wild Wings Inc</td>
<td style="text-align: right">5.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mueller Water Products Series A Ord Shs</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-14.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Central European Distribution Corp</td>
<td style="text-align: right">0.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-15.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Grant Prideco Inc </td>
<td style="text-align: right">-11.33%</td>
</tr>
</table>
</ul>
<p>Interestingly, one of the most popular searches leading to my site is people searching for info on Berkshire Hathaway.  My contention has always been that historically, BRK.B trails in a bull market and does better than the averages in a bear market, and therefore is a relatively safe place in stormy weather; BRK.B is essentially an index fund with no recurring expense fees chipping away at the return.</p>
<p>Best stocks in the cumulative family picks: Buffalo Wild Wings (BWLD), up 5.51%, CVS Caremark (CVS), up 1.91% and Intuitive Surgical, Inc, () up 0.42%.</p>
<p>Worst pick YTD?  Suntech Power Holdings ADR, off 50.73%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.firebones.com/2008/03/31/family-stock-contest-results-end-of-q1-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>-1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Contest: Valentine&#8217;s Day Update</title>
		<link>http://blog.firebones.com/2008/02/14/stock-contest-valentines-day-update/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.firebones.com/2008/02/14/stock-contest-valentines-day-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BWLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock contest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.firebones.com/2008/02/14/stock-contest-valentines-day-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve managed to pull into the lead in the family contest, being down only 5.42% on the year.  Buffalo Wild Wings (BWLD) is pulling me through.



Berkshire Hatha Class B Ord Shs
0.70%

Mindray Medical International Ltd
-19.66%

PowerShares Water Resource Portfolio
-8.18%

Buffalo Wild Wings Inc
10.90%

Mueller Water Products Series A Ord Shs
-9.66%

Central European Distribution Corp
-5.42%


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve managed to pull into the lead in the family contest, being down only 5.42% on the year.  Buffalo Wild Wings (BWLD) is pulling me through.</p>
<ul>
<table style="font-family: Monaco "Courier New" Courier monospace;">
<tr>
<td>Berkshire Hatha Class B Ord Shs</td>
<td style="text-align: right">0.70%</td>
<tr>
<td>Mindray Medical International Ltd</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-19.66%</td>
<tr>
<td>PowerShares Water Resource Portfolio</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-8.18%</td>
<tr>
<td>Buffalo Wild Wings Inc</td>
<td style="text-align: right">10.90%</td>
<tr>
<td>Mueller Water Products Series A Ord Shs</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-9.66%</td>
<tr>
<td>Central European Distribution Corp</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-5.42%</td>
</table>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.firebones.com/2008/02/14/stock-contest-valentines-day-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>-1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

