On the heels of my recent posts related to great programmers of the 70s and 80s, Leonard Richardson comes out this week with an excellent “Where are they now?” follow-up that tracks down the current disposition of each of the programmers profiled in Susan Lammers’ 1986 book Programmers at Work
, another influential text I read in my formative years as a developer.
Lammers’ book profiled what might now be called the original rockstar programmers: guys like Andy Hertzfeld, Charles Simonyi, Dan Bricklin, and Jonathan Sacks.
What’s striking is that unlike the rockstar entrepreneurs of today (on display in PaW’s equally zoological companion book from the 21st century, Founders at Work: Stories of Startups’ Early Days
), the programmers interviewed back in the mid-80s are humble, curious and focused on the code, perhaps even surprised that anyone would care to interview them about their work. In Founders, you can’t open a random page without encountering yet another insufferable ego (with the exception of a few notable interviews with del.icio.us founder Joshua Schacter and recently minted millionaire HOTorNOT founder James Hong); yet in Programmers at Work, the wonder shines through. There aren’t any Zed Shaws lurking in those pages.
Much of Programmers at Work holds up well even after 22 years. By today’s standards, a few of Lammers’ questions seem rather quaint (”Do you write a lot of comments in your programs?”), but then you’ll run into something interesting, like Simonyi taking a potshot at the “cult of simplicity” and how in the long run of computer science and other symbolic sciences, he believes that embracing complexity over simplicity will be what leads to the biggest breakthroughs. Leave it to the space-traveling creator of Hungarian notation to comment on that. At least Lammers didn’t ask Simonyi about his commenting style.
While The Soul Of A New Machine
showed a deep slice of real coders and engineers at work and inspired almost through tacit observation, Programmers at Work captured the breadth of the development opportunities available, in the programmers’ own words, and by showing their own work products in a much more explicit and expository form.
More PaW stuff here:
The New York Times opened up its archives this year, allowing access to about 11 million public domain articles from 1851 to 1922 on its website.
The story behind this massive electronic publishing effort, which leveraged Amazon’s S3 and EC2 Web Services as well as the MapReduce algorithm implemented with Hadoop, stands as testament to how the elimination of technical barriers brought about by falling computing costs let single developers solve problems in days that might have previously taken teams months. Starting with 4TB of source data in TIFF image format, the conversion of these files into PDF format took less than 24 hours to complete, running on 100 parallel Amazon EC2 machine instances. At market rates for EC2, this represents about $240 of computing, plus another $410 for upload bandwidth and presumaby another $41 or so to store the original source material for the two days of the run. The resulting 1.5TB of produced PDF data, at Amazon market rates, would cost the NY Times around $8 a day to host with S3, plus bandwidth costs to serve the content. Based on the presented numbers, the average article size is around 146K, which means that their bandwidth costs, when they have to rely on Amazon, are about $0.13 for every 7,200 articles they have to pull (assuming no local caching at the NYT site). Even a ridiculously small advertising rate would cover this operational cost.
Another story lurks here–since all works published in the United States before 1923 are in the public domain, and not tainted by the Mickey Mouse Copyright Protection Act (as coined by Lawrence Lessig), the content contained in this material is free of copyright (although it’s not clear whether the PDF rendering of the articles are).
Browsing articles from a random date 85 or 100 years ago gives you a glimpse into how little what constitutes public debate has changed. In the 1920s, most issues of the Times had numerous stories covering every angle of prohibition, each serving as an echo still heard in the War on Drugs, from illicit stills exploding and burning down apartment buildings, to police warnings about bad batches of hooch (redistilled wood alcohol and kerosene that removed the foul taste but not the lethal formulation) which were attributed to 100 deaths in a single month, to the investment in technology to stop counterfeiting of certificates granted for allowable uses of alcohol. The battle over evolution raged on with op-ed pieces that could be used nearly without alteration today. During WWI, many articles felt straight out of the War on Terror, with announcements of the arrest of enemy aliens, overviews of modern fighting technology (the novelty of the German armored tank merited note), handsome Thanksgiving dinners for the troops overseas. And in almost every issue, you find someone lamenting the fall of civil society or the problems with kids today.
It struck me that the confluence of these forces–dramtically falling computing costs, an unclosed loophole in copyright law (or more accurately, copyright law acting as intended), and the availability of a significant window into the history of the United States–connected me back to an understanding that though technology has evolved dramatically in the intervening years, the evolution of public discourse and of the underlying themes put forth in the media have changed very little.
Less seriously, the fact that these articles are in the public domain also means they’re fair game for reuse. Hilarity ensues.
In that vein, I offer This Day in History:
Montreal Hunts Slackers: 90 Years Ago Today
Apparently, the draft wasn’t popular with some folks in Canada, and police were engaged to round up these “slackers”. Choice quotes:
The big roundup of Slackers in Montreal began today when the police force set its dragnets and started in to sweep the city.
…
The first part of the city to receive attention was the red light district. There has been a big raid in this neighborhood every night for the last week, and many eligibles have been put under lock and key.
Because if you’re going to dodge the draft, what better place to hang out than with hookers?
Yet another evidence of the “tightening up” process is to be seen in the intimation to the officials of a local hockey club that the military authorities will strongly appeal in the case of every hockey player who has been exempted from service, as it is considered that too many of this class of men in the very best of physical condition are trying to dodge their duty through political influence or otherwise.
Who knew that the fastest game on ice could pose such peril to Canadian national security?
